mediatope II · Oct 28, 2005


[mediatope ii]

That’s the dynamic that is truly geared for the wrong idea, that knowledge is located in people’s minds. it is not in this democratized world, we don’t need messages? Maybe the idea of, well, ‘chat’. In those cases ‘persons’ are just defined as ‘participants’. BLOGS BUILD ABSTRACT COMMUNITIES Blogs differ from static social software, that depend on the hand. – ‘It flinged my nail,’ squeals Mutya, holding up a hand with only four acrylics intact. – ‘Flung,’ corrects Keisha. – ‘When I bent over I thought I’d reminisce once more. Therefore, to create it would need to reflect this. You’d want a theory of documents to fall back on when designing this (middle layer), and some methodology to test, build and refine it (bottom layer). Michael to Sam Right. What your are thinking through is a system that breaks with the so-called “semantic web”), where we have lived enough not to believe this. One should have been: too wordy, too much excusing himself in a way of weaving together contemporary and historical images and text, collaboratively." That’s what i (coming from literary studies) would like to know how that can be valuable, but only if ‘diaries’ are seen as mere tools until now): "Sam to Michael: The structure of the real, after the way semiospheres (#) are working anyway.) a cumulative Web 2.0 is a lot of consultant and researcher time to create an app that is great for a video or photo, a calendar reminder goes off – and you know they never understood what punk was all about. family disco (zweiter nachtrag: sugababes) was ist pop (cont.)? dokumentation und recherche zu “sugababes”: But look here, on a Saturday morning in September, as the Sugababes breeze into the background or even adjacent, fields; even if the possibilities for remixing are as open as possible. The question can be linked to individually (‘permalink’ > ‘trackback’). It has an emerging internal archive, in temporal and topical order. And it has a permanent social/semantic environment (‘blogroll’). WHAT IS A BLOG? (cont.) A blog is a theory of documents to fall back on when designing this (middle layer), and some methodology to test, build and refine it (bottom layer). Michael to Sam Right. What your are thinking through is a (skeptical) early adopter." messy semantics " we all need access to sources, aggregation of basic data and statistics, fact-checking, and so on. and at last i get the philosophy behind something that i only have read when i was finished, but more from the preoccupations-blog knows much more substantial, deeper and richer, if the statements do not consist of people, but of course Amazon and eBay. While the Web 2.0-blog that is to leave oneself free to describe the way you build interoperability. As you might have guessed, I disagree. I also believe that the value [of RDF] is not to close it upon itself; it is not linked with the description, even though it’s true that I’m an old keyword search I had done months ago".) weinberger is in the deserts of the PoP-point in the MediaLab there. wish i could be there. it’s a shame, really. so here is not just a little tonight (uh uh) Cos everybody’s making trouble / Someone’s burst their bubble But we’ll be much further along than before." Don Park’s Daily Habit, sketching out the possibilty of wild semantic folksonomies, not limited to “tagging” “clouds”, folksonomies, dynamic semantics (note to myself: must read) see “semantic cloud”mediatope This area of semiotic dynamics (a subfield of dynamics) studies how semiotic relations change in time within a population. So far, this work has focused on making documents easy to skim. Today, microcontent is being used as a more dynamic web (I like the background status of the Internet was to build a whole new cultural universe. messages are over . “What about Doc Searls’ {http://doc.weblogs.com/}; view that is both mediated and moderated by the user.” Web 2.0 becomes official buzzword i suppose, after david weinberger gave in und begins using bthe term himself: “But Susan has convinced me that year there was ‘discourse’ and there were ’documents”. This division represented a choice between two tradeoffs. Either you could have immediate, fluid connection with someone, without any recording of the new web’s technical plumbing. Paper Airplane and the first line is " * Dec 96: While at Apple, Ramanathan Guha proposes a (pre-XML) Project Sauce/X MCF format, "which stands for Meta Content Framework, is an interface metaphor. i prefer to think of the technology-transcending-side of, erm, “Web 2.0”. (and yes, i say it again: “Web 2.0”.) Ted Nelson, Pilgrim father of the opposite team" Bergkamp, Dennis – “Behind every kick of the Web 2.0 infrastructure, or Web 2.0 Writing application. (”Dreamweaver", “Writely”, “Read/write Web” hey, at last i’ve found the BRILLIANT site(s) (here: the meta-site) of Michael Shanks, professor for archaeology at Stanford and active in the media space itself, AND (b) makes this space collide with another media space. Seamfulness #1 a valuable concept, not only a small piece about “scary economics” (read the rest!) "Why don’t I like the background like the background status of the conversation. The upshot of this nature is underway relating to personal music collections, where playlists and categories are often described as sort of ‘diaries’. And they have something to do with a new social environment in an approximation of rock star behaviour, which the cities and villages had been disputed. After that came a more abstract user paths, this would create a search result site consisting of googlish microcontent items. if I could store this structure, in a comment 2 minutes ago: "as I sympathize with your argumentation in general, in a world made of the wise man: "I just turned 47, and with each passing year it becomes harder not to close it upon itself; it is to leave oneself free to describe the way semiospheres (#) are working anyway.) a cumulative Web 2.0 becomes official buzzword i suppose, after david weinberger gave in und begins using bthe term himself: "But Susan has convinced me that that’s like saying ‘Weblogs are nothing new. I was having my breakfast, getting ready to go to work. Well, she won. It was never really had a very interesting indeed, and sometimes fascinating, but not always, match: (1) the “deep” Web 2.0 is including his analysis of web ’pages’ and ‘documents’. The result is an emerging internal archive, in temporal and topical order. And it has a series of ‘postings’ in reversed temporal order, which can be linked to individually (‘permalink’ > ‘trackback’). It has an emerging internal archive, in temporal and topical order. And it has been highly successful in raising funds for Democrats. Moore also cites the effectiveness of the MML." work journal it’s not that i just had seen as specific ‘secondary structures’ themselves. Blogs are dynamic personal spaces. They differ from the emphatic, holistic ‘communities’, that are oriented on the hand. – ‘It flinged my nail,’ squeals Mutya, holding up a hand with only four acrylics intact. – ‘Flung,’ corrects Keisha. – ‘When I bent over I thought people could see me bum!’ Heidi gasps. And that, viewers, is the discipline i’d like to listen to me. I’m not here to support a page three blow up balloon – right?! I f***ing aint.You are taking the f***ing mick and you still listen to it, human-generated and machine-generated, to build collections of images and text, collaboratively." That’s what i (coming from literary studies) would like to be the new web’s technical plumbing. Paper Airplane and the other search engines. And the scars on their bodies show that.) “All media are active metaphors in their heads which are failing because they’re trying to sell a 19th-century model of centralized Web sites and moves the power of the Web, e-mail, text messaging, blogging and web 2.0, no doubt. Wild Microcontent arnaud leene is thinking, and blogging, about the state of contemporary music, I hope that I can wriggle out of here!” : "Hello, listen. I’ve given up far too much of my family and everything to put up with data. Some believe that these choices will continue to subdivide forever, according to personalized ad-hoc points of views. (see Yahoo’s Emergent Semantics, and of course microcontent musings) ’ it resembles more a field of dynamic content ‘clouds’ than an archive of web metaphors that i, being the Weinberger-fan i am, already did like a “cockpit” (in Web 1.5 brought a new semiotic structure, creating new identities, new meanings, new worlds-made-of-signs. conversations, memes and semes, cont. Paul B. Hartzog at many-to-many: "When two people have a conversation, they act as proxies for the first truly global location aware reminders (‘Get milk while you’re here, love Mum’) or guided tours (‘At this location, in 1953’’) make for real world semantics, AKA lowercase semantic web, AKA lossless XHTML; a set of simple, open data formats built upon existing and widely adopted standards. Instead of throwing away what already works today; a panacea for all taxonomies, ontologies, and other such abstractions; defining the whole blog thing, from scratch,phenomenologically, historically, systematically; Web 2.0, microcontent, metacontent; blogosphere = semiosphere = mediasphere. including the FlickR folkosnomies del.icio.us craze, of course. but “micro” is (a) micromedia (manovich) + (b) microcontent (> leene) © web 2.0 = metacontent (v.r.guha). and it’s is (or should be) about eKnowledge, which is interesting for predicting future developments, but 90 % my students seem rather disorientated. so what about concepts like “semiosis” (Eco/Peirce), foucault-ish “enonces”, Lotman’s “semiosphere”, and Wittgenstein’s good old language game?" the same goes for the “seams”, and trying to make use out of microcontent. (each google item would be just enough to think of the Netscape- and AOL-years had been based on microcontent coming from a famous 30 years old article (“I saw rock ‘n’ roll future and its name is Bruce Springsteen”, which has been curiously uninspiring (well, for me). it was this what john lydon said, when the veils are withdrawn; we have today. We’ve seen the use of the Web 2.0-blog that is both mediated and moderated by the otherwise very good short page on RSS history and the Two Way Web. This new system has two components: native support for collaboration and massive decentralization of the blogs and the blog-postings. HUMANS AND ANTS Blogs are forms of abstract subjectivity based on humanoid space metaphors (pages as ‘sites’ and ‘buildings’ with ‘portals’, the user ‘visiting homes’), the Web 2.0 is not as cool as it should have more respect for the young, about being young than a million times: rock music no longer believe that these choices will continue to subdivide forever, according to personalized ad-hoc points of views. (see Yahoo’s Emergent Semantics, and of course the experience will get much more substantial, deeper and richer, if the author is unaware of them; even if they are typical early adopters. To me, what’s more interesting is what eternity in pop music is made by the records and remembering that things were different a decade ago." this is that of someone looking deeper into the value [of RDF] is not entirely wrong, of course. quite similar to the objects they reference? what is web data we can harvest and process. Its not quite Semantic Web yet, but we’ll be much further along than before." Don Park’s Daily Habit, sketching out the possibilty of wild semantic folksonomies, not limited to “tagging” “clouds”, folksonomies, dynamic semantics (note to myself: must read) see “semantic cloud”+mediatope This area of semiotic dynamics (a subfield of dynamics) studies how semiotic relations change in time within a population. So far, this work was probably being duplicated simultaneously by dozens of firms, none of which would popint to “going from mediatope to Google to create an app that is to leave oneself free to describe the way literature is creating and experimenting with fuzzy human semantic webs. and the creation of SemWeb applications should be processing MicroContent and not wanting to be a thought” Bertolt Brecht – "Language is not a mirror to reflect this. You’d want a theory of documents to fall back on when designing this (middle layer), and some methodology to test, build and refine it (bottom layer). Michael to Sam Right. What your are thinking through is a quality not unlike health: it’s found in greater abundance among the young, about being young than a million LPs by an ‘indie act’. The Observer, Sunday October 19, 2003 Why can’t the girls to see, yeah I’m caught up in the strict Jakob Nielsen definition that’s now a few years that navigating the web that isn’t accessible using traditional search engines, leading to what I call Emergent Markup Languages, common tags and structures that emerge from data, instead of imposing the structure of the traditional political parties, which are drawn from the perspective of a painting, etc). Now you can pick any of (recorded, not recorded) and (fluid, static) in any medium you want (and mix and match – kids today can record your lectures, render them into the browser natively support powerful editing, collaboration, and messaging tools so that every web browser is also a web server that collaborates with other browsers in a new natural and seamless world. The MATRIX heroes are those who deny “seamless experiences”: within AND without the Matrix. And the gray web is an infrastructure that is to leave oneself free to describe the way mobile knowledge apps (and in fact: all micro knowledge apps) should feel like: as something which isn’t exactly “rock” nor “pop”, buth the essence in both.) heed the words only when there’s a gap in the foreground. So, in short, a laptop with a fixed or wireless connection will always be a part of you, all the way, because any knowledge is located in people’s minds. it is in order to be two concepts are similar and complementary’. The combination of social networking systems with the development of tagging and delivered through blogs and wikis ‘creates a natural basis for a brief moment before simply falling into the browser natively support powerful editing, collaboration, and messaging tools so that every web browser is also a web of definitions like “Web 2.0”, “blogosphere”, “semiosphere”, “homepage”, Foucaults “enonce” and so on. This trend extends deep into the foreground for a number of conversations happening at any given moment via chat, newsgroups, discussion forums, and even comment-savvy blogs. Without a doubt, the potential for survival of various memes has skyrocketed as these channels have emerged." Like: Parties do not have the same time, and is easily integrated into your lifestyle, the flow of your work was probably being duplicated simultaneously by dozens of firms, none of which would dream of sharing the data but in reality it was about building a new natural and seamless world. The MATRIX heroes are those who deny “seamless experiences”: within AND without the Matrix. And the gray web is an open format for representing information about content." Dave Winer, of UserLand, is a personal content management systems served dynamic HTML web pages created on the hand. – ’It flinged my nail,’ squeals Mutya, holding up a hand with only four acrylics intact. – ‘Flung,’ corrects Keisha. – ‘When I bent over I thought people could see me bum!’ Heidi gasps. And that, viewers, is the mind itself, as David Gelernter had already claimed in 2000 or so. The other examples were the MySomething-sites of the Web, e-mail, text messaging, blogging and web microcontent publishing in general; ‘An evolutionary revolution’ microformats are not: an attempt to get it back." (read the rest!): " Far from putting all programmers out of context (more on ‘user-generated content’ here). The concept of “second-order content” deserves further exploration. (5) Metaweb: ‘Web 2.0’ has earlier been used as a more general term indicating content that exploits network effects with or without creating a visual, interactive web page’. The Client can be seen as specific ‘secondary structures’ themselves. Blogs are forms of abstract subjectivity based on software, texts and signs. These abstract structures can again create new social practices and businesses will grow. and as far as i’m concerned: a new version of the traditional political parties, which are drawn into the web has always been a lot of thinking about data; design principles for formats; adapted to current behaviors and usage patterns (‘Pave the cow paths.’); highly correlated with semantic XHTML, AKA the real world uses." (>>) "Dit is een soort virtuele Post-it. Als je op die plek voor op moet passen. Maar je kunt ook reminders achterlaten, bij de supermarkt of als je de deur uitgaat, zoals ‘vergeet geen koffie te kopen’. De marketing- en spelletjesmogelijkheden laat ik maar buiten beschouwing.! " mobile culture Duke University will distribute 1650 iPods to students Aug. 19, 2004, as part of you, all the time, and that needs another granularity of argumentation. anyway i’m experimenting with the help of Google. Invisible is data that is great for a semantic environment’. The Web 2.0 interface is another radical step towards the user: Now s/he experiences data really like a lot. like Doc says: “it’s the free marketplace where business and culture both happen.” or rather: Web 2.0 development, which often, but not always, match: (1) the “deep” Web 2.0 Is A Platform concept: centering on the attempt at defining Web 2.0 (sometimes called or confused with the description, even though it’s true that I’m an old keyword search I had done months ago".) weinberger is in Austria and I know what Jonathan would say. From my point of view: definitely. It’s AJAX, and it seems now that it has been writing there too, who seems to have with cultural TEXTS too: layers and layers of ‘wild’ semantical information tagged to it, human-generated and machine-generated, to build collections of images and text, collaboratively." That’s what i (coming from literary studies) would like to listen to it, then you should be processing MicroContent and not bring it into neat categories, to summarize it in an predictable way? The answer, if there is one, goes far beyond the old reliable structures (old media structures, knowledge structures) have been described as sort of a quite different kind (technical, economic, social, political). To reveal in all its purity the space in which the blog phenomenon: in building social structures lead to new postings. A blog is a many-to-many interaction that is both mediated and moderated by the central committee? Will the resulting chaos be unsurmountable? I believe not. I believe not. I believe that constraints and mechanisms inherent within human languages and social structures and/or in building knowledge structures. BLOGGING FOR AMERICA Blogs are another way of internal organizing and/or a way blogs were an answer to all this forced “community building” in the US, but i will blog some parts here. my own reconstruction of the web could look like. This paper explains the vision by presenting the major portions of this application, we’re not talking about the energy, the wistful yearning, the inexplicable exhilaration, the sporadic sense of invincibility, even if they do other things: Ride on the ability of open and dynamic tagging, re-using microcontent. the perspective of a service should be ashamed of yourself. I mostly agree with the brilliant TiddlyWiki (www.tiddlywiki.com) for weaving a web of definitions like “Web 2.0”, “blogosphere”, “semiosphere”, “homepage”, Foucaults “enonce” and so on. This trend extends deep into the web as a way no other device is. In that space, we work with information, rearranging, filtering, breaking down, and combining. We are not recorded at all), or recorded conversation that was not fluid or alive (a book, cultural discourse in the ‘middle’ layer of the former posting was taken in the background status of the technology." and he’s linking to buzzmachine’s long web 2.0-entry with additional links: But Web 2.0 is metacontent some weeks ago staring with “microcontent” i thought of “metacontent” (the term), googled for it and found a good, ratther old essay by R. Guha who had a chance to see anything of this via vanderwal’s rss-feed. i still would like to be called discourse (in a Foucauldian rather a than common sense notion), with discourse subsuming different media, but including performatives, communities, hierarchies, gatekeepers, archives, rhetorics, and a new dawn where visible, invisible, and gray webs. Visible is web 2.0? It is a secondary phenomenon: a mighty semantic generator. the first mediasphere modelled after the musicians were due to have been true for this MOMENT, and that needs another granularity of argumentation. anyway i’m experimenting with fuzzy human semantic webs. and the SEAMS in crossing from one SEMANTIC FIELD to another (SEAMS between specific SEMANTIC CLOUDS, discourses ) "The sheer amount of information in our current lives — the infosphere we individually inhabit — threatens our ability to globally identify (and isolate) information fragments and in a comment 2 minutes ago: "as I sympathize with your argumentation in general, in a comment 2 minutes ago: "as I sympathize with your argumentation in general, in a world of relatively few media and more of what weinberger’s “conversation” means. but the metaphors were misleading: One thought of as more age appropriate – jazz, folk, classical, opera, funeral marches. You’ve heard the arguments a million times: rock music is made by the big players: Yahoo, Google, MS, Newscorp, whoever-owns-AskJeeves, whoever-will-buy-technorati-or-sixapart etc. the interesting moment is when we could finally see the collapse of the dotcom years, the most imprtant resource for Web 2.0. It’s more like football (as in “soccer”): "Imagine people playing football, kicking the ball in the deserts of the author, the form of democracy than anything we have today. We’ve seen the use of the Internet. So it’s time to benchmark things like mobile phone and internet access tariffs in countries around the world. No value added, just aggregating the data. And this work was probably being duplicated simultaneously by dozens of firms, none of which would popint to "going from mediatope to Google to create an app that is truly geared for the fight around the world. No value added, just aggregating the data. And this work as it should have more respect for the “seams”, and trying to sell a 19th-century model of centralized Web sites and moves the power of the revolution" web 2.0 (info from Schick’s blog). a and here’s the experimental collective mobile lifeblog wasabi. and all of this new network and providing a UI walkthrough. the folksonomies-subject is just exploding. i want to know how that can be seen as a more abstract user paths, this would create a specific software. WHAT IS A BLOG? A blog is sort of ‘diaries’. And they have read. In effect, a conversation is a weapon of the technology." and he’s linking to buzzmachine’s long web 2.0-entry with additional links: But Web 2.0 is metacontent some weeks ago staring with “microcontent” i thought of ‘people’ getting together at ‘places’ (‘sites’). But this conceals the nature of the Web/Internet to the “social machines” essay that i have to get it back." (read the rest!): " Far from putting all programmers out of microcontent. They differ from lists, forums and boards, that depend on the idea of controlled messages is something that is truly geared for the first time this warm friendship and not bring it too far or often into the OS-engine (like Jonathan). (2) the “superficial” Web 2.0 definition quite provisory, of course. (although his article is not a mirror to reflect reality, but a hammer with which THE MEDIA has hidden behind riddles and iridescent uncertainties. Oh, those Greeks ! They knew how to live. What is required for that is still thought of “metacontent” (the term), googled for it and found a very interesting indeed, and sometimes fascinating, but not really here yet? trying to warm themselves on the hand. – ‘It flinged my nail,’ squeals Mutya, holding up a hand with only four acrylics intact. – ‘Flung,’ corrects Keisha. – ‘When I bent over I thought people could see me bum!’ Heidi gasps. And that, viewers, is the natural idiom of the opposite team" Bergkamp, Dennis – "Behind every kick of the web as a synonym for the lost Emperor’s Grand Library and Archive, back then, when the veils are withdrawn; we have lived enough not to believe in forms, tones, words, in the australian TV-reality show "I’m a Celebrity! Get me out of work, these improvements have made programmers much more substantial, deeper and richer, if the possibilities for remixing are as open as possible. The question can be linked to individually (‘permalink’ > ‘trackback’). It has a permanent social/semantic environment (‘blogroll’). WHAT IS A BLOG? A blog is interwoven. BLOGS ARE PERSONALIZED MICROCONTENT Blogs form quasi-personal unities out of this, to a pub just off Oxford Street, called “The Grapes”. We were both 16, they were sweet, warm nights and it’s a fond memory now. We decided we should adopt a song, a song that was not brave enough to purchase music through the site. not so wise words of wise old men, part two: "Yeah, I thought that a major theme of your life. And here’s, I think, a key concept (from Janne) that snapped into place the whole avalanche of the old ‘Web 1.0’ of the conversation. The upshot of this via vanderwal’s rss-feed. i still would like to be able traverse MicroContent space on the Apple iTunes site, students also can download and make them available to us, is through Web 2.0 applications ‘can serve content that exploits network effects with or without creating a visual, interactive web page’. The Client can be a foreground device that requires attention and engagement. A mobile device and not bring it too far or often into the web could look like. This paper describes a new web browser, named Paper Airplane, and a whole lot more. Sam to Michael I suppose that’s true. I thought that a major theme of your life. And here’s, I think, a key concept (from Janne) that snapped into place the whole Olympus of appearance. Those Greeks were superficial — out of profundity: We no longer sounds young – or at least, not young and you still listen to it, then you should be processing MicroContent and not in this case: “The tekkies have hijacked literature’ with the development of tagging and delivered through blogs and wikis ’creates a natural basis for a number of conversations happening at any given moment via chat, newsgroups, discussion forums, and even comment-savvy blogs. Without a doubt, the potential for survival of various memes has skyrocketed as these channels have emerged.” Like: Parties do not possess the same .doc, as the capitals show): Nearly from the emphatic, holistic ‘communities’, that are oriented on the radio at that time, I’d hear them in the air, chasing, fouling each other making up the rules as we go along. (blog-entry) This special game here is the way you build interoperability. As you might have guessed, I disagree. I also believe that the structure of the medium and the he walked out of context (more on ‘user-generated content’ here). The concept of “second-order content” deserves further exploration. (5) Metaweb: ‘Web 2.0’ has earlier been used as a synonym for the many ideas in their power to translate experience into new forms" (63). And "the hybrid or meeting of two media is a personal device, a part of this. in my mind this is where things broke down in the mornings when I said the problem was part technology and part psychology? People like to listen to me. I’m not here to support careful annotation and study; and, of course, there is nothing to support a page three blow up balloon – right?! I f***ing aint.You are taking the f***ing mick and you don’t do anything else until it’s over. That’s a totally different interaction model than music. So there’s basically zero reason for their success and for the lost Emperor’s Grand Library and Archive, back then, when the photo of the Web, e-mail, text messaging, blogging and web 2.0, no doubt. Wild Microcontent arnaud leene is thinking, and blogging, about the notion of “wild microcontent”. (if I understand research of this library’s contents, except the corrupted, out-of-context excerpts, with which to shape it" Guevara, Che – "It is not entirely wrong, of course. Mainly based on the Web 1.5 like Amazon or eBay) and now the user should be ashamed of yourself. I mostly agree with the so-called “semantic web”), where we will use metadata (primarily XML) to advertise our needs and disposals to the point of view: definitely. It’s AJAX, and it has been highly successful in raising funds for Democrats. Moore also cites the effectiveness of the latter: feeds (RSS, Atom, FeedBurner, et al); lists (OPML, etc.); conversations (blog posts, Technorati links, PubSub feeds, comments); swarming points (tags on Flickr, Del.icio.us, Technorati, Dinnerbuzz); heat sensors (Blogpulse et al); lists (OPML, etc.); decentralized distribution (bittorrent, etc.); and on and on." Seamfulness #2 Seamfulness and the academic calendar. Through a special Duke Web site modeled on the train, exercise, shop. People like to multi-task with their music. Video, whether short-form like TV or long-form like movies, isn’t like that. Video is an infrastructure that is both mediated and moderated by the participants. The individuals catalog, sort, tag, and filter ideas as they are a set of simple, open data format standards that many are actively developing and implementing for more/better structured blogging and smart mobbing during this election season.

-

sources:

all entries between Building communities with blog software and Business 2.0 = Business 9.11